This content is a collaboration with a Skift partner, not a standard ad. Read it for the industry angle, not the gloss.
Experiential travel is exploding. Boutique hotels, once a niche, are projected to hit $28 billion in 282025, soaring past $50 billion by the early 2030s. Why? Because travelers are tired of sameness. They want context. Design. Stories that don’t come from a corporate manual.
But here’s the problem. The thing that makes these hotels desirable, their individuality, makes them impossible to scale in the traditional sense.
Investors are flooding the segment, chasing a luxury industry expected to break $2 trillion in the next decade. But owner-led boutique properties resist the one thing that enables massive growth. Standardization. They fight it, by design.
RARE India, a curator of such offbeat stays, just secured investment from SAMHI Hotels to navigate this exact tension. We asked Founder Shoba Rudra how you scale the unscaleable without losing the soul of the brand.
The Curator’s Dilemma
Rudra has been in this game for over twenty years. Some things haven’t changed. The curation is still obsessive. She meets the owners. First. Then the property. It’s about vision. If the owner wants to build a fortress of conservation in the middle of a metropolis, she’ll take a look. If they’re just building another beige box, no deal.
“What’s stayed consistent is our approach,” Rudra said. “We look for heritage. Craft. Cuisine.”
But the market has shifted. Early on, it was mostly about getting foreigners in. Now? It’s about the domestic traveler, too. The goal isn’t just to sell to the West. It’s to build a portfolio that works globally.
Why SAMHI?
Rudra had talks with other investors. Most wanted to leverage the RARE brand name and strip away the ethos. They wanted the label, not the labor. They didn’t get it.
“I’d rather have closed the business,” she admitted. “Compromise that vision? No.”
SAMHI Hotels was different. From day one, they got it. They understood that “rare” isn’t just a word in the name. It’s a constraint.
RARE should remain “rare.”
No push to standardize. No blind expansion. Just preservation. That distinction matters more than money.
From Club to Platform
Before the pandemic, RARE operated like an exclusive club. A membership-driven B2B model. They helped hotels with positioning and stories. The bookings? Those went directly to the hotels. RARE collected a fee. Small fees. Limited impact.
Then everything stopped.
The shift was inevitable. To survive, you need more than influence. You need transactions. Rudra had a loyal base already, a database of people who engaged with RARE on social media and newsletters for years. The engagement was there. The revenue wasn’t.
“We needed to convert that into cumulative revenue,” she said.
This wasn’t about chasing the herd. It was about converting trust into tangible support for these small properties. By taking a cut of the booking, RARE can prove its value. It allows them to participate in the outcome, not just cheer from the sidelines.
Scaling Without Standardizing
Here’s the hard truth about experiential hospitality. Scaling breaks the product.
When properties start to look the same, you’ve failed. Rudra refuses to let that happen. “No two hotels should look or sound alike,” she insisted. “Because they can’t.”
So they’re scaling the backbone, not the body. Better distribution. Global visibility. Tech stacks that actually work.
The partnership with SAMHI isn’t about adding hundred of identical hotels. It’s about building a technology platform that allows these unique, fragmented properties to find their specific audience. A hotel in a remote Himalayan valley isn’t just competing with its neighbors. It’s competing with every boutique property in London. Tokyo. New York.
Without global tech, you’re invisible. With it, you can convert demand into trackable bookings.
The Metrics of Integrity
Quality control in a curated network isn’t about checking boxes. It’s about storytelling. If the story is performative, it dies. Rudra runs the curation personally. The investors haven’t changed a thing.
But the margins have tightened. The minimum room count for properties is shifting slightly up. From 8 to 12 keys, roughly. Commercial viability is still a requirement, after all.
They aren’t rushing back to volume either. Once, RARE had over 100 properties. Then they cut it down to manage quality with a lean team. Now? With better tech, they can rebuild the portfolio. But the rule stands. If it looks like every other hotel, it’s out.
Community, Not Content
“Tourism for good” sounds like marketing fluff. At the property level, it looks like payroll.
About 60% of the staff at these hotels are hired locally. Most from within a 60-mile radius, sometimes directly from the village. Why? To stop the bleeding of talent.
Urban migration strips regions of their best minds and workers. Quality of life plummets. RARE’s model aims to build livelihoods near home. Use local materials. Hire local cooks. Showcase local crafts.
When this is done well… you start to see crafts revived.
It creates a ripple effect. Farming returns. Because someone is buying the crops. Pride returns. Because the community sees themselves in the design, not erased by it.
How do they measure if it works? Not just by occupancy rates. Look at employment. Look at whether the local artisan is back in business. Is the landscape being sustained, or exploited?
What Success Actually Looks Like
In three to five years, will RARE measure success by scale? No.
“The biggest metric will always be how each hotel is doing,” Rudra said.
Success is whether a partner sees stronger business across all seasons. Whether they feel supported when the phone rings at midnight. Whether they trust the platform.
Retention is the ultimate KPI. The hotels that stay are proof. The ones that leave? Data points for improvement.
Scale matters. Margins matter. Brand recognition matters. But those are outcomes. Secondary effects. The core metric is resilience. Can each hotel tell its story effectively? Can it survive a hyper-competitive global market? Can it remain rare?
That’s a question that doesn’t have a neat answer yet. And it shouldn’t.
